Casimir's observation was that the second-quantized quantum electromagnetic field, in the presence of bulk bodies such as metals or dielectrics, must obey the same boundary conditions that the classical electromagnetic field must obey. In particular, this affects the calculation of the vacuum energy in the presence of a conductor or dielectric.

Consider, for example, the calculation of the vacuum expectation value of the electromagnetic field inside a metal cavity, such as, for example, a radar cavity or a microwave waveguide. In this case, the correct way to find the zero point energy of the field is to sum the energies of the standing waves of the cavity. To each and every possible standing wave corresponds an energy; say the energy of the nth standing wave is E_{n}. The vacuum expectation value of the energy of the electromagnetic field in the cavity is then

with the sum running over all possible values of n enumerating the standing waves. The factor of 1/2 corresponds to the fact that the zero-point energies are being summed (it is the same 1/2 as appears in the equation ). Written in this way, this sum is clearly divergent; however, it can be used to create finite expressions.

In particular, one may ask how the zero point energy depends on the shape s of the cavity. Each energy level E_{n} depends on the shape, and so one should write En(s) for the energy level, and for the vacuum expectation value. At this point comes an important observation: the force at point p on the wall of the cavity is equal to the change in the vacuum energy if the shape s of the wall is perturbed a little bit, say by δs, at point p. That is, one has

This value is finite in many practical calculations.[6]

**Casimir's calculation**

In the original calculation done by Casimir, he considered the space between a pair of conducting metal plates a distance a apart. In this case, the standing waves are particularly easy to calculate, since the transverse component of the electric field and the normal component of the magnetic field must vanish on the surface of a conductor. Assuming the parallel plates lie in the x-y plane, the standing waves are

where ψ stands for the electric component of the electromagnetic field, and, for brevity, the polarization and the magnetic components are ignored here. Here, kx and ky are the wave vectors in directions parallel to the plates, and

is the wave-vector perpendicular to the plates. Here, n is an integer, resulting from the requirement that ψ vanish on the metal plates. The energy of this wave is

where c is the speed of light. The vacuum energy is then the sum over all possible excitation modes

where A is the area of the metal plates, and a factor of 2 is introduced for the two possible polarizations of the wave. This expression is clearly infinite, and to proceed with the calculation, it is convenient to introduce a regulator (discussed in greater detail below). The regulator will serve to make the expression finite, and in the end will be removed. The zeta-regulated version of the energy per unit-area of the plate is

In the end, the limit is to be taken. Here s is just a complex number, not to be confused with the shape discussed previously. This integral/sum is finite for s real and larger than 3. The sum has a pole at s=3, but may be analytically continued to s=0, where the expression is finite. Expanding this, one gets

where polar coordinates were introduced to turn the double integral into a single integral. The q in front is the Jacobian, and the 2π comes from the angular integration. The integral is easily performed, resulting in

The sum may be understood to be the Riemann zeta function, and so one has

But ζ( − 3) = 1 / 120 and so one obtains

The Casimir force per unit area F_{c} / A for idealized, perfectly conducting plates with vacuum between them is

where

(hbar, ℏ) is the reduced Planck constant,

c is the speed of light,

a is the distance between the two plates.

The force is negative, indicating that the force is attractive: by moving the two plates closer together, the energy is lowered. The presence of shows that the Casimir force per unit area F_{c} / A is very small, and that furthermore, the force is inherently of quantum-mechanical origin.

**More recent theory**

A very complete analysis of the Casimir effect at short distances is based upon a detailed analysis of the van der Waals' force by Lifshitz.[7][8] Using this approach, complications of the bounding surfaces, such as the modifications to the Casimir force due to finite conductivity can be calculated numerically using the tabulated complex dielectric functions of the bounding materials. In addition to these factors, complications arise due to surface roughness of the boundary and to geometry effects such as degree of parallelism of bounding plates.

For boundaries at large separations, retardation effects give rise to a long-range interaction. For the case of two parallel plates composed of ideal metals in vacuum, the results reduce to Casimir’s.[9]

**Measurement**

One of the first experimental tests was conducted by Marcus Sparnaay at Philips in Eindhoven, in 1958, in a delicate and difficult experiment with parallel plates, obtaining results not in contradiction with the Casimir theory [10] [11], but with large experimental errors.

The Casimir effect was measured more accurately in 1997 by Steve K. Lamoreaux of Los Alamos National Laboratory [12] and by Umar Mohideen and Anushree Roy of the University of California at Riverside [13]. In practice, rather than using two parallel plates, which would require phenomenally accurate alignment to ensure they were parallel, the experiments use one plate that is flat and another plate that is a part of a sphere with a large radius. In 2001, a group at the University of Padua finally succeeded in measuring the Casimir force between parallel plates using microresonators [14].

**Regularization**

In order to be able to perform calculations in the general case, it is convenient to introduce a regulator in the summations. This is an artificial device, used to make the sums finite so that they can be more easily manipulated, followed by the taking of a limit so as to remove the regulator.

The heat kernel or exponentially regulated sum is

where the limit is taken in the end. The divergence of the sum is typically manifested as

for three-dimensional cavities. The infinite part of the sum is associated with the bulk constant C which does not depend on the shape of the cavity. The interesting part of the sum is the finite part, which is shape-dependent. The Gaussian regulator

is better suited to numerical calculations because of its superior convergence properties, but is more difficult to use in theoretical calculations. Other, suitably smooth, regulators may be used as well. The zeta function regulator

is completely unsuited for numerical calculations, but is quite useful in theoretical calculations. In particular, divergences show up as poles in the complex s plane, with the bulk divergence at s=4. This sum may be analytically continued past this pole, to obtain a finite part at s=0.

Not every cavity configuration necessarily leads to a finite part (the lack of a pole at s=0) or shape-independent infinite parts. In this case, it should be understood that additional physics has to be taken into account. In particular, at extremely large frequencies (above the plasma frequency), metals become transparent to photons (such as x-rays), and dielectrics show a frequency-dependent cutoff as well. This frequency dependence acts as a natural regulator. There are a variety of bulk effects in solid state physics, mathematically very similar to the Casimir effect, where the cutoff frequency comes into explicit play to keep expressions finite. (These are discussed in greater detail in Landau and Lifshitz, "Theory of Continuous Media".)

**Generalities**

The Casimir effect can also be computed using the mathematical mechanisms of functional integrals of quantum field theory, although such calculations are considerably more abstract, and thus difficult to comprehend. In addition, they can be carried out only for the simplest of geometries. However, the formalism of quantum field theory makes it clear that the vacuum expectation value summations are in a certain sense summations over so-called "virtual particles".

More interesting is the understanding that the sums over the energies of standing waves should be formally understood as sums over the eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian. This allows atomic and molecular effects, such as the van der Waals force, to be understood as a variation on the theme of the Casimir effect. Thus one considers the Hamiltonian of a system as a function of the arrangement of objects, such as atoms, in configuration space. The change in the zero-point energy as a function of changes of the configuration can be understood to result in forces acting between the objects.

In the chiral bag model of the nucleon, the Casimir energy plays an important role in showing the mass of the nucleon is independent of the bag radius. In addition, the spectral asymmetry is interpreted as a non-zero vacuum expectation value of the baryon number, cancelling the topological winding number of the pion field surrounding the nucleon.

**Casimir effect and wormholes**

Exotic matter with negative energy density is required to stabilize a wormhole.[15] Morris, Thorne and Yurtsever[16] pointed out that the quantum mechanics of the Casimir effect can be used to produce a locally mass-negative region of space-time, and suggested that negative effect could be used to stabilize a wormhole to allow faster than light travel. This was used in the novel Warp Speed by Travis S. Taylor.

**Analogies**

A similar analysis can be used to explain Hawking radiation that causes the slow "evaporation" of black holes (although this is generally visualised as the escape of one particle from a virtual particle-antiparticle pair, the other particle having been captured by the black hole).

**Reversal**

Through the use of a perfect lens (one with the ability to focus an image with resolution unrestricted by the wavelength of light)[17] with a negative refractive index, the effect can be reversed, causing small objects to be repelled rather than attracted.[18] However, because of the scale at which the effect applies, its applications are most likely to be found in nanotechnology.[19] [20] According to Professor Ulf Leonhardt and Dr Thomas Philbin of the University's School of Physics & Astronomy, it is theoretically possible to levitate objects as big as humans, but scientists are a long way from developing the technology for such feats.[21]

**Applications**

It has been suggested that the Casimir forces have application in nanotechnology, in particular silicon integrated circuit technology based micro- and nanoelectromechanical systems, and so-called Casimir oscillators.

[22]

**Technology**

The Economist, May 24th-30th, 2008, highlighted practical applications of the Casimir Effect. Casimir "stiction" which is the focus of this article affects the designs of the smallest computer chips. In addition, Casimir "repulsion," which occurs when a liquid between the plates promotes an electromagnetic repulsion force that might be useful in nanomechanics.

**Philosophy**

Because the Casimir effect relies on the fact that something commonly pops into existence from the vacuum, the Casimir effect is used by some as an argument in support of a purely natural origin to the universe.[citation needed]

**Popular culture**

In relation to science fiction, although the nature of the effect has not been revealed yet, during an orientation video of the TV series Lost, a Dharma Initiative doctor (Dr. Edgar Halliwax[23]) states that the island exhibits a "Casimir effect."[24] This may explain why the Island exhibits strange temporal qualities like time displacement from the rest of the world. In the final episode of its fourth season, the effect was elaborated on by the mention of a "pocket of negatively charged exotic matter" and an apparent occurrence of time travel.

**References**

**^** The Force of Empty Space on Physical Review Focus
**^** A. Lambrecht, The Casimir effect: a force from nothing, *Physics World*, September 2002.
**^** American Institute of Physics News Note 1996
**^** RL Jaffe *Casimir effect and the quantum vacuum*
**^** Photo of ball attracted to a plate by Casimir effect
**^** For a brief summary, see the introduction in R. Passante, S. Spagnolo: *Casimir-Polder interatomic potential between two atoms at finite temperature and in the presence of boundary conditions*
**^** IE Dzyaloshinskii, EM Lifshitz, LP Pitaevskii: *General theory of van der Waals' forces*
**^** Dzyaloshinskii IE & Kats EI *Casimir forces in modulated systems*
**^** F. Intravaia, C. Henkel & A. Lambrecht: *The role of surface plasmons in the Casimir effect*
**^** M.J. Sparnaay, "Attractive forces between flat plates", *Nature* **180**, 334 (1957)
**^** M.J. Sparnaay, "Measurement of attractive forces between flat plates", *Physica* **24**, 751 (1958)
**^** S. K. Lamoreaux, "Demonstration of the Casimir Force in the 0.6 to 6 µm Range", *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **78**, 5–8 (1997)
**^** U. Mohideen and Anushree Roy, "Precision Measurement of the Casimir Force from 0.1 to 0.9 µm", *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **81**, 004549 (1997)
**^** G. Bressi, G. Carugno, R. Onofrio, G. Ruoso, "Measurement of the Casimir force between Parallel Metallic Surfaces", *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **88** 041804 (2002)
**^** M. Visser (1995) *Lorentzian Wormholes: from Einstein to Hawking*, AIP Press, Woodbury NY, ISBN 1-56396-394-9
**^** M. Morris, K. Thorne, and U. Yurtsever, Wormholes, Time Machines, and the Weak Energy Condition, *Physical Review, 61*, 13, September 1988, pp. 1446 - 1449
**^** Perfect lens could reverse Casimir force (July 30, 2007). Retrieved on 2007-08-10.
**^** Experts float levitation theory (August 5, 2007). Retrieved on 2007-08-18.
**^** Levitation is floating around out there. *J. Micah Grunert* (2007-08-08). Retrieved on 2007-08-09.
**^** New way to levitate objects discovered (2007-08-06). Retrieved on 2007-09-21.
**^** Telegraph, 8-8-2007
**^** F Capasso, JN Munday, D. Iannuzzi & HB Chen *Casimir forces and quantum electrodynamical torques: physics and nanomechanics*
**^** http://www.lostpedia.com/wiki/Marvin_Candle
**^** *Orchid Orientation film*

**Further reading**

* Introductory

- Papers, books and lectures
- H. B. G. Casimir, and D. Polder,
*The Influence of Retardation on the London-van der Waals Forces*, *Physical Review*, Vol. **73**, Issue 4, pp. 360-372 (1948). [1]
- H. B. G. Casimir, "On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates"
*Proc. Kon. Nederland. Akad. Wetensch.* **B51**, 793 (1948)
- S. K. Lamoreaux, "Demonstration of the Casimir Force in the 0.6 to 6 µm Range",
*Phys. Rev. Lett.* **78**, 5–8 (1997)
- M. Bordag, U. Mohideen, V.M. Mostepanenko, "New Developments in the Casimir Effect", ArXiv quant-ph/0106045.
*(275 page review paper.)* (2001)
- G. Bressi, G. Carugno, R. Onofrio, G. Ruoso, "Measurement of the Casimir force between Parallel Metallic Surfaces",
*Phys. Rev. Lett.* **88** 041804 (2002)
- O. Kenneth, I. Klich, A. Mann and M. Revzen,
*Repulsive Casimir forces*, Department of Physics, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, February 2002
- J. D. Barrow, "Much ado about nothing", (2005) Lecture at Gresham College.
*(Includes discussion of French naval analogy.)*
- Barrow, John D. (2000).
*The book of nothing : vacuums, voids, and the latest ideas about the origins of the universe*, 1st American Ed., New York: Pantheon Books. ISBN 0-09-928845-1. (Also includes discussion of French naval analogy.)

- Temperature dependence

**Links**

* Casimir effect article search on arxiv.org

* G. Lang, The Casimir Force web site, 2002

**Physics Encyclopedia**