Compsognathus, Compsognathus,

Fossil range: Late Jurassic
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Sauropsida
Superorder: Dinosauria
Order: Saurischia
Suborder: Theropoda
Family: Compsognathidae
Genus: Compsognathus
Wagner, 1859

C. longipes Wagner, 1859 (type)

Compsognathus (pronounced /kɒmpˈsɒgnəθəs/,[1] Greek kompsos/κομψος; "elegant", "refined" or "dainty", and gnathos/γναθος; "jaw")[2] was a small, bipedal, carnivorous theropod dinosaur. The animal was the size of a turkey and lived around 150 million years ago, the early Tithonian stage of the late Jurassic Period, in what is now Europe. Paleontologists have found two well-preserved fossils, one in Germany in the 1850s and the second in France more than a century later. Many popular presentations still describe Compsognathus as a "chicken-sized" dinosaur because of the small size of the German specimen, which is now believed to be a juvenile form of the larger French specimen. Compsognathus is one of the few dinosaurs for which the diet is known with certainty: the remains of small, agile lizards are preserved in the bellies of both specimens. Teeth discovered in Portugal may be further fossil remains of the genus.

Although not recognized as such at the time of its discovery, Compsognathus is the first dinosaur known from a reasonably complete skeleton. Today, C. longipes is the only recognized species, although the larger specimen discovered in France in the 1970s was once thought to belong to a separate species, C. corallestris. Until the 1980s and 1990s, Compsognathus was the smallest known dinosaur and the closest supposed relative of the early bird Archaeopteryx. Thus, the genus is one of the few dinosaur genera to be well known outside of paleontological circles.


For decades, Compsognathus was famed as the smallest dinosaur known; the specimens collected were around 1 meter (3 ft) in length. However, dinosaurs discovered later, such as Caenagnathasia, Microraptor and Parvicursor, were even smaller. Compsognathus is estimated to have weighed around 3 kg (6.5 lb).[3]

Compsognathus was a small, bipedal animal with long hind legs and a longer tail, which it used for balance during locomotion. The forelimbs were smaller than the hindlimbs and featured three digits equipped with solid claws suited for grasping prey. Its delicate skull was narrow and long, with a tapered snout. The skull had five pairs of fenestrae (skull openings), the largest of which was for the orbit (eye socket).[3] The eyes were large in proportion to the rest of the skull.

The lower jaw was slender and had no mandibular fenestra, a hole in the lower jawbone commonly seen in archosaurs. The teeth were small but sharp, suited for its diet of small vertebrates and possibly other small animals, such as insects. Its frontmost teeth (those on the premaxilla) were unserrated, unlike those further back in the jaw. Scientists have used these dental characteristics to identify Compsognathus and its closest relatives.[4]

Discovery and species

Compsognathus is known from two nearly complete skeletons, one from Germany that is 89 cm long (35 in) and another from France that is 125 cm (49 in).[5] The physician and fossil collector Joseph Oberndorfer discovered the German specimen (BSP AS I 563) in the Solnhofen lithographic limestone deposits in the Riedenburg-Kelheim region of Bavaria during the 1850s. The limestone of the Solnhofen area has also yielded such well-preserved fossils as Archaeopteryx with feather impressions and some pterosaurs with imprints of their wing membranes that are dated to the lower Tithonian age. Johann A. Wagner described the specimen briefly in 1859 and in more detail in 1861, when he coined the name Compsognathus longipes.[6] In early 1868, Thomas Huxley hypothesized that the specimen was closely related to the dinosaurs,[7] and in 1896, Othniel Marsh recognized the fossil as a true member of that group.[8] John Ostrom thoroughly redescribed the species in 1978, making it one of the best-known small theropods at that time.[9] The German specimen is on display at the Bayerische Staatsammlung für Paläontologie und historische Geologie (Bavarian State Institute for Paleontology and Historical Geology) in Munich, Germany.

The larger French specimen (MNHN CNJ 79) was discovered in 1972 in the Portlandian lithographic limestone of Canjuers near Nice in southeastern France. It dates to the lower Tithonian. Although Bidar originally described the specimen as a separate species called Compsognathus corallestris,[10] Michard and others have since relabeled it as another example of Compsognathus longipes.[11][12] Quimby identified the smaller German specimen as a juvenile of the same species.[13] In 1983, the Muséum national d'histoire naturelle in Paris acquired the French Compsognathus fossil; Michard thoroughly studied it there.[11] Scientists originally identified a partial foot, also from Solnhofen, as belonging to a Compsognathus, but later research has disproved this. Zinke has assigned teeth from the Kimmeridgian Guimarota formation of Portugal to the genus.[14]


During the late Jurassic, Europe was a dry, tropical archipelago at the edge of the Tethys Sea. The fine limestone in which the skeletons of Compsognathus have been found originated in calcite from the shells of marine organisms. Both the Solnhofen and Canjuers area where Compsognathus has been preserved were lagoons situated between the beaches and coral reefs of the Jurassic European islands in the Tethys Sea.[15] Contemporaries of Compsognathus include the early bird Archaeopteryx and the pterosaurs Rhamphorhynchus and Pterodactylus. The same sediments in which Compsognathus has been preserved also contain fossils of a number of marine animals such as fish, crustaceans, echinoderms and marine mollusks, confirming the coastal habitat of this theropod. No other dinosaur has been found in association with Compsognathus indicating that this little dinosaur might in fact have been the top land predator in these islands.



The Compsognathus specimen discovered in Germany in the 19th century featured only two digits on each forelimb, leading scientists to conclude that this was how the creature appeared in life.[9] However, the fossil discovered later in France revealed the manus (hands) to have had three digits,[16] similar to other members of compsognathid genera. The fossilization of the German Compsognathus had simply failed to preserve the specimen's forefeet. Bidar supposed that the French specimen had webbed forefeet, which would look like flippers in life.[10] In the 1975 book The Evolution and Ecology of the Dinosaurs, L. B. Halstead depicts the animal as an amphibious dinosaur capable of feeding on aquatic prey and swimming out of reach of larger predators.[17] Ostrom debunked this hypothesis[9] by showing conclusively that the French specimen was nearly identical to the German specimen in every aspect but its size. Peyer confirmed these conclusions.[12]


he remains of a lizard in the German specimen's thoracic cavity show that Compsognathus preyed on small vertebrates.[4] Marsh, who examined the specimen in 1881, thought that this small skeleton inside Compsognathus belly was an embryo, but in 1903, Franz Nopcsa concluded that it was a lizard.[18] Ostrom identified the remains as belonging to a lizard of the genus Bavarisaurus,[19] which he concluded was a fast and agile runner due to its long tail and limb proportions. This in turn led to the conclusion that its predator, Compsognathus, must have had sharp vision and the ability to rapidly accelerate and outrun the lizard.[9] The Bavarisaurus is in a single piece, indicating that Compsognathus must have swallowed its prey whole. The French specimen's gastric contents consist of unidentified lizards or sphenodontids.[12]

Possible eggs

Excavators discovered eggs 10 mm in diameter near the fossil remains of the German Compsognathus. In 1901, Friedrich von Huene interpreted them as dermal ossifications.[20] Griffiths redescribed them as immature eggs in 1993.[21] However, later researchers have doubted their assignment to the genus because they were found outside the body cavity of the animal. A well-preserved fossil of Sinosauropteryx, a genus related to Compsognathus, shows two oviducts bearing two unlaid eggs. These proportionally larger and less numerous eggs of Sinosauropteryx cast further doubt on the original identification of the Compsognathus eggs.[4]

Feathers and connection with birds

For nearly a century, Compsognathus was the only well-known small theropod. This led to comparisons with Archaeopteryx and to suggestions of a relationship with birds. In fact, Compsognathus, rather than Archaeopteryx, piqued Huxley's interest in the origin of birds.[22] The two animals share many similarities in shape, size and proportions, so many in fact that a featherless skeleton of an Archaeopteryx was for many years misidentified as a Compsognathus.[3] Many other dinosaurs, including Deinonychus, Oviraptor and Segnosaurus, are now known to have been more closely related to birds.

No feathers or feather-like covering have been preserved with Compsognathus fossils, in contrast to Archaeopteryx, which was found in the same sediments; many depictions of Compsognathus thus show it without feathers. However, the only feathers found in association with Archaeopteryx are the large ones on the wings and tail; the short ones that likely covered the body have rarely been preserved. Von Huene reported the presence of a fossilized patch of skin in the abdominal region of the German Compsognathus,[20] but Ostrom later disproved this.[9] Relatives of Compsognathus, namely Sinosauropteryx and Sinocalliopteryx, have been preserved with the remains of simple feathers covering the body like fur,[23] indicating that Compsognathus might have been feathered in a similar way.[24] In contrast, a patch of fossilized skin from the tail and hindlimb of another presumed compsognathid genus, Juravenator, only shows scales, with no indication that feathers were present in the preserved areas. This may mean that feather covering was not ubiquitous in this group of dinosaurs, though a 2007 re-evaluation by Butler and Upchurch cast doubt on the assignment of Juravenator to the same family as Compsognathus.[25][26]


Compsognathus gives its name to the family Compsognathidae, a group composed mostly of small dinosaurs from the late Jurassic and early Cretaceous periods of China, Europe and South America.[12] For many years it was the only member known; however in recent decades paleontologists have discovered several related genera. The clade includes Aristosuchus,[27] Huaxiagnathus,[28] Mirischia,[29] Sinosauropteryx,[30][23] and perhaps Juravenator[31] and Scipionyx.[32] At one time, Mononykus was proposed as a member of the family, but this was rejected by Chen and coauthors in a 1998 paper; they considered the similarities between Mononykus and the compsognathids to be an example of convergent evolution.[4] The position of Compsognathus and its relatives within the coelurosaur group is uncertain. Some, such as theropod expert Thomas Holtz Jr. and co-authors Ralph Molnar and Phil Currie in the landmark 2004 text Dinosauria, hold the family as the basalmost of the coelurosaurs,[33] while others as part of the Maniraptora.[34][35]

In popular culture

Children's dinosaur books commonly feature Compsognathus. For a long time it was unique in its small size, as most other small dinosaurs were discovered and described a century or more later.[36][37]

More recently, the animal has appeared in the movies The Lost World: Jurassic Park and Jurassic Park III. In The Lost World: Jurassic Park, one of the characters incorrectly identifies the species as "Compsognathus triassicus", combining the genus name of Compsognathus with the species name of Procompsognathus, a distantly related small carnivore featured in the Jurassic Park novels. The "compys" are depicted as social animals that hunt in packs which makes them capable of taking down human-sized prey through overwhelming numbers. This behavior was invented by the creators of Jurassic Park as there is indeed no indication from the scientific point of view that Compsognathus (or Procompsognathus) had such social behavior.


  • ^ "Compsognathus", Oxford English Dictionary, Second Edition
  • ^ Liddell & Scott (1980). Greek-English Lexicon, Abridged Edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. ISBN 0-19-910207-4. 
  • ^ a b c Lambert, David (1993). The Ultimate Dinosaur Book. New York: Dorling Kindersley. pp. 38–81. ISBN 156458304X. 
  • ^ a b c d Chen, Pei-ji; Zhi-ming Dong and Shuo-nan Zhen (1998). "An exceptionally well-preserved theropod dinosaur from the Yixian Formation of China". Nature 391: 147–152. doi:10.1038/34356. Retrieved on 3 March 2007. 
  • ^ Paul, Gregory S. (1988). "Early Avetheropods". Predatory Dinosaurs of the World. New York: Simon & Schuster. pp. 297–300. ISBN 0-671-61946-2. 
  • ^ Wagner, A. (1861). "Neue Beiträge zur Kenntnis der urweltlichen Fauna des lithographischen Schiefers; V. Compsognathus longipes Wagner". Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 9: 30–38. 
  • ^ Huxley, T.H. (1868). "On the animals which are most nearly intermediate between birds and reptiles". Annals and Magazine of Natural History, London 2: 66–75. 
  • ^ Marsh, O.C. (1896). "Classification of dinosaurs". Geological Magazine 3: 388–400. 
  • ^ a b c d e Ostrom, J.H. (1978). "The osteology of Compsognathus longipes". Zitteliana 4: 73–118. 
  • ^ a b Bidar, A.; Demay L., Thomel G. (1972). "Compsognathus corallestris, une nouvelle espèce de dinosaurien théropode du Portlandien de Canjuers (Sud-Est de la France)". Annales du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de Nice 1: 9–40. 
  • ^ a b Michard, J. G. (1991). "Description du Compsognathus (Saurischia, Theropoda) de Canjuers (Jurassique supérieur du Sud-est de la France), position phylogénétique, relation avec Archaeopteryx et implications sur l’origine théropodienne des oiseaux,". Ph.D. dissertation, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris. 
  • ^ a b c d Peyer, K. (2006). "A Reconsideration Of Compsognathus From The Upper Tithonian Of Canjuers, Southeastern France". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 26 (4): 879–896. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2006)26[879:AROCFT]2.0.CO;2. 
  • ^ Callison, G.; H. M. Quimby (1984). "Tiny dinosaurs: Are they fully grown?". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 3: 200–209. 
  • ^ Zinke, J. (1998). "Small theropod teeth from the Upper Jurassic coal mine of Guimarota (Portugal)". Palaontologische Zeitschrift 72: 179–189. 
  • ^ Viohl, G. (1985). "Geology of the Solnhofen lithographic limestone and the habitat of Archaeopteryx". in Hecht MK, Ostrom JH, Viohl G, Wellnhofer P, (eds.). The Beginnings of Birds: Proceedings of the International Archaeopteryx Conference.. Eichstätt: Freunde des Jura-Museums. pp. 31–44. OCLC 13213820. 
  • ^ Gauthier, J.; Gishlick A.D. (2000). "Re-examination of the manus of Compsognathus and its relevance to the original morphology of the Coelurosaur manus". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 20 (3, Supplement): 43A. 
  • ^ Halstead L.B. (1975). The evolution and ecology of the dinosaurs. Eurobook. ISBN 0856540188. 
  • ^ Nopcsa, Baron F. (1903). "Neues ueber Compsognathus". Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie, Geologie und Palaeontologie (Stuttgart) 16: 476–494. 
  • ^ Evans, S.E. (1994). "The Solnhofen (Jurassic: Tithonian) lizard genus Bavarisaurus: new skull material and a reinterpretation". Neues Jahrbuch für Paläontologie und Geologie, Abhandlungen 192: 37–52. 
  • ^ a b von Huene, F. (1901). "Der vermuthliche Hautpanzer des "Compsognathus longipes" Wagner". Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie and Palaeontologie 1: 157–160. 
  • ^ Griffiths, P. (1993). "The question of Compsognathus eggs". Revue de Paleobiologie Spec. 7: 85–94. 
  • ^ Fastovsky DE, Weishampel DB (2005). "Theropoda I:Nature red in tooth and claw". in Fastovsky DE, Weishampel DB. The Evolution and Extinction of the Dinosaurs (2nd Edition). Cambridge University Press. pp. 265–299. ISBN 0-521-81172-4. 
  • ^ a b Currie, P.J.; P. Chen (2001). "Anatomy of Sinosauropteryx prima from Liaoning, northeastern China". Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 38 (12): 1705–1727. doi:10.1139/cjes-38-12-1705. 
  • ^ Ji, S., Ji, Q., Lu J., and Yuan, C. (2007). "A new giant compsognathid dinosaur with long filamentous integuments from Lower Cretaceous of Northeastern China." Acta Geologica Sinica, 81(1): 8–15.
  • ^ Xu, Xing (2006). "Palaeontology: Scales, feathers and dinosaurs". Nature 440 (7082): 287. doi:10.1038/440287a. 
  • ^ Butler, R.J., and Upchurch, P. (2007). "Highly incomplete taxa and the phylogenetic relationships of the theropod dinosaur Juravenator starki." Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 27(1): 253–256.
  • ^ Seeley, H.G. (1887). "On Aristosuchus pusillus (Owen), being further notes on the fossils described by Sir. R. Owen as Poikilopleuron pusillus, Owen". Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 43: 221–228. 
  • ^ Hwang, S.H.; M. A. Norell, J. Qiang and G. Keqin (2004). "A large compsognathid from the Early Cretaceous Yixian Formation of China". Journal of Systematic Paleontology 2: 13–39. doi:10.1017/S1477201903001081. 
  • ^ Naish, D.; Martill, D. M. and Frey, E. (2004). "Ecology, systematics and biogeographical relationships of dinosaurs, including a new theropod, from the Santana Formation (?Albian, Early Cretaceous) of Brazil". Historical Biology: 1–14. 
  • ^ Ji, Q.; Ji S.A. (1996). "On discovery of the earliest bird fossil in China and the origin of birds (in Chinese)". Chinese Geology 233: 30–33. 
  • ^ Göhlich, U.; L. M Chiappe (2006). "A new carnivorous dinosaur from the Late Jurassic Solnhofen archipelago". Nature 440 (7082): 329–332. doi:10.1038/nature04579. 
  • ^ Dal Sasso, C.; M. Signore (1998). "Exceptional soft-tissue preservation in a theropod dinosaur from Italy". Nature 392 (6674): 383–387. doi:10.1038/32884. 
  • ^ Holtz TR, Molnar RE, Currie PJ (2004). "Basal Tetanurae". in Weishampel DB, Osmólska H, Dodson P. The Dinosauria (2nd Edition). University of California Press. pp. 105. ISBN 0-520-24209-2. 
  • ^ Gauthier, J.A. (1986). "Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds". In Padian, K. (ed.) The Origin of Birds and the Evolution of Flight, Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences 8: 1–55. 
  • ^ Forster, C.A.; Sampson, S.D., Chiappe, L.M. & Krause, D.W. (1998). "The theropod ancestry of birds: new evidence from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar". Science 279: 1915–1919. doi:10.1126/science.279.5358.1915. PMID 9506938. 
  • ^ Wilson, Ron (1986). 100 Dinosaurs from A to Z. New York: Grosset & Dunlap. pp. 18. ISBN 0-448-18992-5. 
  • ^ Attmore, Stephen (1988). Dinosaurs. Newmarket, England: Brimax Books. pp. 18. ISBN 0-86112-460-X.

    External links

  • Dinosaurs

    Biology Encyclopedia

    Retrieved from ""
    All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License

    Home - Hellenica World