Fine Art

Cladus: Eukaryota
Supergroup: Opisthokonta
Regnum: Animalia
Subregnum: Eumetazoa
Cladus: Bilateria
Cladus: Nephrozoa
Cladus: Protostomia
Cladus: Ecdysozoa
Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Chelicerata
Classis: Arachnida
Subclassis: Acari
Superordo: Acariformes
Cladi: Sarcoptiformes - Trombidiformes

* Incertae sedis: Endeostigmata


Acariformes Zakhvatkin, 1952


* Domes, K.; Althammer, M.; Norton, R.A.; Scheu, S.; Maraun, M. 2007: The phylogenetic relationship between Astigmata and Oribatida (Acari) as indicated by molecular markers. Experimental & applied acarology, 42: 159-171.
* O'Connor, B.M. 1984: Phylogenetic relationships among higher taxa in the Acariformes, with particular reference to the Astigmata. Pp. 19-27 in Griffiths, D.A.; Bowman, C.E. Acarology VI, Vol. I. Ellis-Horwood Ltd., Chichester.

Vernacular names
English: Mitelike Mites


The Acariformes are the more diverse of the two superorders of mites. There are over 32,000 described species in 351 families, and an estimated total of 440,000 to 929,000, including undescribed species.

Systematics and taxonomy

The Acariformes can be divided into two main clades - Sarcoptiformes and Trombidiformes. In addition, there is a paraphyletic group containing primitive forms, the Endeostigmata, which was formerly also considered distinct. The latter is composed of only 10 families of little-studied, minute, soft-bodied mites that ingest solid food, such as fungi, algae and soft bodied invertebrates like nematodes, rotifers and tardigrades. These clades were formerly considered suborders but this does not allow for a sufficiently precise classification of the mites and is abolished in more modern treatments; the Endeostigmata are variously considered to form a suborder on their own (the old view) or are included mainly in the Sarcoptiformes, thus making both groups monophyletic.[1]

Another group often mentioned is the Actinedida. But in treatments like the present one this is split up between the Sarcoptiformes (and formerly the separate Endostigmata) and Trombidiformes (which contains the bulk of the "Actinedida"), because it appears to be a massively paraphyletic "wastebin taxon", uniting all Acariformes that are not "typical" Oribatida and Astigmata.[1][2] The Trombidiformes present their own problems. The small group Sphaerolichida appears to be the most ancient lineage among them. However, the Prostigmata are variously subdivided into the Anystina and Eleutherengona, and Eupodina. The delimitation and interrelationships of these groups are entirely unclear; while most analyses find one of the latter two but not the other to be a subgroup of the Anystina, neither of these mutually contradicting hypotheses is very robust; possibly this is a simple error because phylogenetic software usually fails in handling non-dichotomous phylogenies. Consequently it may be best for the time being to consider each of the three main prostigmatan lineages to be equally distinct from the other two.[2]


The Sarcoptiformes ingest solid food, being mainly microherbivores, fungivores and detritivores. Some Astigmata – the Psoroptida – have become associated with vertebrates and nest-building insects. These include the well known house dust mites, scab mites and mange mites, stored product mites, feather mites and some fur mites. The relationships between their main groups are not well-resolved and subject to revision. In particular it appears as if the Oribatida need to be split up in two, as the Astigmata are closer to some of them (e.g. certain Desmonomata) than the latter are to other "Oribatida".

The Trombidiformes are most noted for the economic damage caused by many plant parasite species. All of the most important plant pests among the Acari are trombidiformans, such as spider mites (Tetranychidae) and Eriophyidae. Many species are also predators, fungivores and animal parasites. Some of the most conspicuous species of free-living mites are the relatively large and bright red velvet mites, that belong to the family Trombidiidae.

Oribatid mites and to a much lesser extent others are a source of alkaloids in poison frogs (namely small species like the Strawberry Poison-dart Frog Oophaga pumilio). Such frogs raised without these orbatids in their diet do not develop the strong poisons associated with them in the wild.[3]

Lorryia formosa (Trombidiformes: Tydeidae)


* Cheese mites
* Epidermoptidae
* Gastronyssidae
* Sarcoptes scabiei


* Demodex mite
* Eriophyidae, plant parasites, e.g. Acalitus essigi (redberry mite)
* Erythraeidae
* Labidostommatidae
* Polydiscia deuterosminthurus
* Smarididae
* Spider mites, e.g. Tetranychus urticae
* Tarsonemidae, a number of which are plant pests, e.g. Acarapis woodi
* Tydeidae


1. ^ a b Heather Proctor (August 9, 1998). "Acariformes. The "mite-like" mites". Tree of Life Web Project. Retrieved December 30, 2007.
2. ^ a b Heather Proctor (August 9, 1998). "Trombidiformes. Trombidiform mites". Tree of Life Web Project. Retrieved December 30, 2007.
3. ^ Ralph A. Saporito, Maureen A. Donnelly, Roy A. Norton, H. Martin Garraffo, Thomas F. Spande & John W. Daly (2007). "Oribatid mites as a major dietary source for alkaloids in poison frogs" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (21): 8885–8890. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702851104. PMID 17502597. PMC 1885597.

Further reading

* David Walter & Heather Proctor (1999). Mites: Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour. CABI Publishing. ISBN 9780851993751.


Biology Encyclopedia

Retrieved from ""
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License

Home - Hellenica World